Tweets
    thisisnotpsychology: Signs of Pseudoscience via Psychology - From Inquiry to Understanding An imposter of science is pseudoscience: a set of claims that seem scientific but aren’t. In particular, pseudoscience lacks the safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science. We must be careful to distinguish pseudoscientific claims from metaphysical claims, which as we’ve seen, are untestable and therefore lie outside the realm of science. In principle, at least, we can test pseudoscientific claims, although the proponents of these claims often avoid subjecting them to rigorous examination. Pseudoscientific and other questionable beliefs are widespread. A recent survey of the U.S. public shows that 41 percent of Americans believe in extrasensory perception (ESP); over 30 percent in haunted houses, ghosts, and telepathy; and 25 percent in astrology (Musella, 2005). The fact that many Americans entertain the possibility of such beliefs isn’t by itself worrisome, because a certain amount of open-mindedness is essential for scientific thinking. Instead, what’s troubling is that many Americans appear convinced that such claims are correct even though the scientific evidence for them is either weak, as in the case of ESP, or essentially nonexistent, as in the case of astrology. Moreover, it’s troubling that many poorly supported beliefs are more popular, or at least more widespread, than well-supported beliefs. To take merely one example, there are about 20 times as many astrologers as astronomers in the United States (Gilovich, 1991). sounds like my lab reports….

    thisisnotpsychology:

    Signs of Pseudoscience

    via Psychology - From Inquiry to Understanding

    An imposter of science is pseudoscience: a set of claims that seem scientific but aren’t. In particular, pseudoscience lacks the safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science. We must be careful to distinguish pseudoscientific claims from metaphysical claims, which as we’ve seen, are untestable and therefore lie outside the realm of science. In principle, at least, we can test pseudoscientific claims, although the proponents of these claims often avoid subjecting them to rigorous examination.

    Pseudoscientific and other questionable beliefs are widespread. A recent survey of the U.S. public shows that 41 percent of Americans believe in extrasensory perception (ESP); over 30 percent in haunted houses, ghosts, and telepathy; and 25 percent in astrology (Musella, 2005).

    The fact that many Americans entertain the possibility of such beliefs isn’t by itself worrisome, because a certain amount of open-mindedness is essential for scientific thinking. Instead, what’s troubling is that many Americans appear convinced that such claims are correct even though the scientific evidence for them is either weak, as in the case of ESP, or essentially nonexistent, as in the case of astrology. Moreover, it’s troubling that many poorly supported beliefs are more popular, or at least more widespread, than well-supported beliefs. To take merely one example, there are about 20 times as many astrologers as astronomers in the United States (Gilovich, 1991).

    sounds like my lab reports….

    4,639 notes
    Posted on Sunday, 29 July
    Tagged as: astrology scientific literacy education science astronomy cosmology
    Reblogged from: shychemist
    Posted by: thisisnotpsychology
    Next Post Previous Post
    1. dengekirose reblogged this from ashharyu
    2. ashharyu reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    3. ngonyamainduna reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    4. kaitxoxox reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    5. jakeekiss reblogged this from thunderwishes
    6. thunderwishes reblogged this from we-are-star-stuff
    7. luminosiity reblogged this from stfuconservatives
    8. super-rainbows reblogged this from self-injuryshark
    9. xionapplecheeks reblogged this from theonetruenidoking
    10. patricin reblogged this from bookofeibon
    11. thatcadmusguy reblogged this from theonetruenidoking
    12. ntmns reblogged this from theonetruenidoking
    13. bookofeibon reblogged this from theonetruenidoking
    14. theonetruenidoking reblogged this from bonesaw-is-ready
    15. bonesaw-is-ready reblogged this from iamthekj
    16. iamthekj reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    17. numlockismynemesis reblogged this from goddessofknittingandcake
    18. goddessofknittingandcake reblogged this from mouthfulofchocolatedust
    19. vittorevanamersvoort reblogged this from blind-chihuahua
    20. mouthfulofchocolatedust reblogged this from greatmindsofscience
    21. kim-jong-fun reblogged this from greatmindsofscience
    22. blind-chihuahua reblogged this from fiul-risipit
    Theme Urban v3 by Max Davis