Tweets
    thisisnotpsychology:

Signs of Pseudoscience
via Psychology - From Inquiry to Understanding
An imposter of science is pseudoscience: a set of claims that seem scientific but aren’t. In particular, pseudoscience lacks the safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science. We must be careful to distinguish pseudoscientific claims from metaphysical claims, which as we’ve seen, are untestable and therefore lie outside the realm of science. In principle, at least, we can test pseudoscientific claims, although the proponents of these claims often avoid subjecting them to rigorous examination.
Pseudoscientific and other questionable beliefs are widespread. A recent survey of the U.S. public shows that 41 percent of Americans believe in extrasensory perception (ESP); over 30 percent in haunted houses, ghosts, and telepathy; and 25 percent in astrology (Musella, 2005).
The fact that many Americans entertain the possibility of such beliefs isn’t by itself worrisome, because a certain amount of open-mindedness is essential for scientific thinking. Instead, what’s troubling is that many Americans appear convinced that such claims are correct even though the scientific evidence for them is either weak, as in the case of ESP, or essentially nonexistent, as in the case of astrology. Moreover, it’s troubling that many poorly supported beliefs are more popular, or at least more widespread, than well-supported beliefs. To take merely one example, there are about 20 times as many astrologers as astronomers in the United States (Gilovich, 1991).

sounds like my lab reports….

    thisisnotpsychology:

    Signs of Pseudoscience

    via Psychology - From Inquiry to Understanding

    An imposter of science is pseudoscience: a set of claims that seem scientific but aren’t. In particular, pseudoscience lacks the safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science. We must be careful to distinguish pseudoscientific claims from metaphysical claims, which as we’ve seen, are untestable and therefore lie outside the realm of science. In principle, at least, we can test pseudoscientific claims, although the proponents of these claims often avoid subjecting them to rigorous examination.

    Pseudoscientific and other questionable beliefs are widespread. A recent survey of the U.S. public shows that 41 percent of Americans believe in extrasensory perception (ESP); over 30 percent in haunted houses, ghosts, and telepathy; and 25 percent in astrology (Musella, 2005).

    The fact that many Americans entertain the possibility of such beliefs isn’t by itself worrisome, because a certain amount of open-mindedness is essential for scientific thinking. Instead, what’s troubling is that many Americans appear convinced that such claims are correct even though the scientific evidence for them is either weak, as in the case of ESP, or essentially nonexistent, as in the case of astrology. Moreover, it’s troubling that many poorly supported beliefs are more popular, or at least more widespread, than well-supported beliefs. To take merely one example, there are about 20 times as many astrologers as astronomers in the United States (Gilovich, 1991).

    sounds like my lab reports….

    4,701 notes
    Posted on Sunday, 29 July
    Tagged as: astrology scientific literacy education science astronomy cosmology
    Reblogged from: shychemist
    Posted by: thisisnotpsychology
    Next Post Previous Post
    1. amandanvak reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    2. civilengineerzico reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    3. iridie reblogged this from cachal
    4. omnisx reblogged this from ljmaystrader
    5. ljmaystrader reblogged this from garykingoftheworld
    6. crushedbutterfly101 reblogged this from garykingoftheworld
    7. garykingoftheworld reblogged this from crescent-coral-base
    8. crescent-coral-base reblogged this from aidanphantom
    9. frostbitekisses reblogged this from grammarmancer
    10. canadianfairy reblogged this from nor-gay
    11. nor-gay reblogged this from aidanphantom
    12. aidanphantom reblogged this from morningchorus
    13. morningchorus reblogged this from grammarmancer
    14. grammarmancer reblogged this from realcleverscience
    15. nffcfan86 reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    16. neemaxxx reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    17. what-you-are-is-lovely reblogged this from self-injuryshark
    18. purplecowsftw reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    19. bandannarama reblogged this from desidia5ever
    20. kassyandstar reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    21. mikovargas reblogged this from self-injuryshark
    22. jesuswasakike reblogged this from tentakrule
    23. recovered2012 reblogged this from thisisnotpsychology
    Theme Urban v3 by Max Davis